The Supreme Court's ruling on property rights reveals deep divisions among judges, with a majority criticizing past judgments for economic biases.

In practical terms, the ruling means that not all private assets are open to State acquisition for public distribution ...

The interpretation was introduced by Justice Krishna Iyer in ... State as the ultimate goal would undermine the values and ...

The Union, however, argued that the interpretation of ‘material resources’ should be guided by evolving constitutional ...

Justice Chandrachud referred to the verdicts in the Ranganatha Reddy vs State of Karnataka case (1977), which was heard by a ...

As the author of the Oct. 8 Student Association Congress resolutions, I am deeply disappointed by the Judicial Board’s recent ...

A regression discontinuity analysis finds essentially no effect of 1 additional year of secondary education on brain structure in adulthood. This is a valuable finding that adds to the literature on ...

Binance and Zhao's legal team filed a motion to dismiss the SEC's amended complaint, contesting the regulator's approach to ...

With key developments taking shape in the global carbon credit trade just a few weeks from COP29, experts ...

Also read:Private property is a human right: Supreme Court The interpretation was introduced by Justice ... goal would ...

Curbing government control over private property under Article 39(b) of the Constitution, the court ruled that not all private assets qualified as “material resources of the community” ...

Bonnie Zindel’s latest Hamptons showing has made an impression. Since opening this summer at Water Mill’s Windmill Art ...